NCAA I new Scholarship Limits 2025-26

NCAA I Athletic Scholarship Limits 2025-26:

As part of the House v NCAA settlement, scholarship restrictions on all NCAA I sports will be eliminated and roster limits will apply instead.  This could create a substantial increase in athletic scholarships especially in non-revenue sports. For example, the scholarship limit in women’s rowing will increase from 20 to 68, in softball from 12 to 25 and in baseball from 11.7 to 34.  Here are the new limits under the proposal:

Scholarship Limits
per Sport 2025-26
TeamOld
limit
New
limit
Men's NCAA I Sports
BaseballM11.734
BasketballM1315
FencingM4.524
FootballM85105
GolfM4.59
GymnasticsM6.320
HockeyM1826
LacrosseM12.648
SkiingM6.316
SoccerM9.928
SwimmingM9.930
TennisM4.510
Track / X-CM12.662
VolleyballM4.518
Water poloM4.524
WrestlingM9.930
Women's NCAA I Sports
BasketballW1515
Beach VolleyballW619
BowlingW511
EquestrianW1550
FencingW524
Field hockeyW1227
GolfW69
GymnasticsW1220
HockeyW1826
LacrosseW1238
RowingW2068
RugbyW1236
SkiingW716
SoccerW1428
SoftballW1225
SwimmingW1430
TennisW810
Track / X-CW1862
TriathlonW6.514
AcrobaticsW1455
VolleyballW1218
Water poloW824
WrestlingW1030
Mixed / Coed Sports
RifleMix3.612
StuntMix1465

The potential impact of these additional awards is massive. Under our calculations, NCAA I schools could potentially award over 80,000 additional “full-ride” scholarships. Assuming a value of $ 35,000 annually per scholarship, this would result in around $ 3 billion in additional scholarship awards per year – substantially more than the estimated $ 1.8 billion in revenue sharing payments projected for 2025-26.

But the actual increase is going to be substantially less than $ 3 billion. Scholarships awards are optional – a school can fully fund a sport or make awards less than the maximum allowed. Many schools already operate with roster sizes less than the NCAA limit, and they will have a new financial incentive to operate with even smaller teams.

And sadly, we’re likely to see cuts to non-revenue sports at many schools. Athletic directors are looking at a new reality where the costs of sponsoring a non-revenue sport are likely to increase significantly, while the historical offsetting subsidy from sports such as football is being substantially decreased due to new revenue sharing obligations – $ 20.5 million annually for virtually all Power Conference Schools. There are likely going to be painful decisions to make about non-revenue sports at many schools.

See our sister site NIL-NCAA.com for more information on Division I revenue Sharing.